Ce qui devrait être évité

J'essaie toujours d'être clair dans mes billets et d'éviter le verbiage incompréhensible, mais ce n'est pas toujours possible. Pourtant je me considère moi-même comme étant plutôt stupide (je n'ai pas une bonne image de moi-même), alors me faire comprendre ne devrait pas être un problème.

Je voulais tout de même retranscrire ici une réponse que j'ai envoyé sur un autre blog (anarchopragmatisme) en guise d'exemple de billet que je tente d'éviter.

Pour ce qui est des «free riders», si des gens ne travaillent pas et ne poduisent rien, ils recevront tout de même un salaire, mais ce sera l’équivalent de ce que nous avons comme aide sociale. Je ne vois pas comment un groupe pourrait se la couler douce sans qu’il n’en subisse les conséquences. Corrige moi si j’ai mal compris.

À savoir si on parle de marché, Albert s’en défend:« Market allocation by another name? It is true that participatory planning has numeric indicators that we call indicative prices and that people and institutions in a parecon consult these indicative prices to make their decisions. And it is also certainly true that the mix and match of the decisions that people make in participatory planning come into accord, via a meshing of supply and demand. Some deduce from these facts that participatory planning must therefore be a disguised market system. It turns out this is mostly a matter of confused terminology, not substance. If one means by market system, a system in wich there are prices and in wich supply and demand come into accord during allocation, then yes, participatory planning would be a market system. But with that definition, all non trivial allocation systems would qualify as market systems (even including central planning) and instead of markets being a specific kind of allocation mechanism with its own particular properties, the word market would be a synonym for allocation itself, and we would need a new word for what economists more typically call a market system. [...]

But nonetheless, parecon does not incorporate a market, because, among other factors:

.Participatory planning doesn’t have buyers and sellers maximizing their own advantage each at the cost of the other.

.It doesn’t have competitively determined prices.

.It doesn’t have profit or surplus maximization.

.It doesn’t have remuneration according to bargaining power or output.»

Désolé pour la longueur, mais c’était dur de faire autrement.